The state policies They must have two central elements to give rise to their existence: consensus and time. Unlike government policies that are capitalized by the management that implements them, state policies transcend a presidency but have the backing of the ruling party and the opposition, at least the latter, for the most part.
The government of Alberto Fernández has serious problems to recreate a state policy. Even regarding a scourge that should facilitate the search for consensus such as the pandemic. The problem is that the President began the fight against the coronavirus as a State policy – photo with Horacio Rodríguez Larreta – but a few months later, Cristina Kirchner, through, embarked on a fight with the opposition to impose the judicial agenda of the vice in search of impunity. And he broke ties with whom the Instituto Patria considers the main enemy of the ruling party, Larreta, who was cut $ 65 billion in the middle of the pandemic and given five minutes before warning.
In a serious country, not Argentina, Fernández would have summoned his predecessor, Mauricio Macri, in March 2020, to establish an “umbrella” over the political discussion and Chicanas and see how to buy as many vaccines as possible. It was clear that Macri’s international contacts – one of the few positive results of his administration – would add him to Alberto F., whose ties were those provided by Cristina with Russia, China, Venezuela and Cuba. But none of that happened.
Nor did it allow the provinces to obtain doses and the Ministry of Health assumed the prerogative of purchasing vaccines. Just now says that no province is prevented from buying. But it is too late, because the laboratories have one on demand. Would the Instituto Patria panic that Larreta would get more doses and capitalize on it politically? It is probable.
The last time that Argentina used the concept of “State policy” and “umbrella” to set aside political differences was in the Malvinas question. Pragmatic, as is Peronism in its essence, Carlos Menem and his chancellor Guido Di Tella put the discussion of sovereignty under an “umbrella” and made progress in matters of fisheries, scientific cooperation, demining, and the return of relatives of Argentine soldiers who fell on the islands in the 1982 war, and in other areas.
It is clear that Felipe Solá is very far from being Di Tella, either by audacity or by expertise; neither is Alberto Fernández Menem. The Riojan was the undisputed leader of Peronism, and when Eduardo Duhalde, his vice, had discrepancies with the government’s policy, Menem offered him a decent way out and, just a year and a half after supporting him, Duhalde left as governor of the province. from Buenos Aires. Something very different from the power relationship between Alberto and Cristina.
“Alberto is more similar to Menem in terms of profile, more conciliatory, dialogueist. For this reason, like the Turk, he should have a cabinet of ministers with political volume and he should reserve the last word. And not to replicate the power scheme of Nestor Kirchner, whose personality was much more forceful but also overwhelming “reflects an official leader.
The limitations to establish a State policy –because if Alberto F. summons it, it is likely that Cristina will be dynamited later- are interspersed with poor political communication.
At the same time that Minister Eduardo “Wado” de Pedro proposed to the deputies of Together for Change a proposal to form a commission to monitor the pandemic, with the idea of remove health policy from the electoral discussion -Something that also suits the Government- the President, angrily, branded sectors critical of the Government “imbeciles” and “miserable”. Was the idea for the proposal to prosper or fall?
So Together for the Change he went out to object. They suspect that with the creation of a commission the Government seeks share the political cost of a bad vaccination campaignNot only because of the lack of doses but also because of the scandals of officials and militants who were inoculated without belonging to any risk group, something that did not happen in the City.
There is no clear political communication in the government, a story that makes society perceive that the Frente de Todos is a homogeneous bloc. Quite the contrary, what the ruling party tries to explain as “a plurality that enriches”, in truth towards the outside, it translates into uncertainty – fear – and an internal one for power.
Uncertainty because you don’t know who’s boss. Or how it should be read that from the IMF – Alejandro Werner, official for the region – have stated that there are “significant differences of opinion within the political alliance of President Alberto Fernández” on how to negotiate the debt, in clear allusion to what Minister Martín Guzmán proclaims – inflation goals, subsidy cuts, rate updates, salary control, reduction of the fiscal deficit – and what Cristina Kirchner prefers – freezing, subsidies and increase to turn it over to consumption, persecution of companies so that prices do not increase, which has prevailed.
The affirmations from the IMF at a time when the Minister of Economy is on a tour of Europe to try to convince the member countries of the IMF and obtain more benefits in the negotiations with the Fund, is a bucket of cold water and discredits him. “Why don’t we let Cristina go to negotiate the debt with Kicillof and that’s it, so there are no doubts and we whitewash the situation”, ironic a legislator of the FdT.
An internal power is also observed because it is not clear who commands the health policy, if Carla Vizzotti, the Minister of Health of the Nation, or her Buenos Aires counterpart, Daniel Gollán in tandem with her deputy, Nicolás Kreplak. One day after recording a message from the villa in Olivos and announcing the new restrictions, Gollán called for more severe measures.
Even during the weekend, while Vizzotti pointed out that the increase in infections was “worrying” and explained that the measures adopted were minimal, Gollán, who responds directly to Cristina, warned that at this rate the health system could “collapse at any time moment ”and even questioned what was said by the Chief of Staff, Santiago Cafiero, who opened the door for the provinces to buy vaccines.
The problem is that the president’s word loses weight and it no longer causes the same effect. On the contrary, any Buenos Aires official can discredit Alberto Fernández or any minister of the national cabinet. But The paradox is that the Buenos Aires government, of another political color, respects more the guidelines of the Casa Rosada in matters of Health than the province itself, of the same political color.
.
#ruling #party #consensus #clear #political #message
source https://pledgetimes.com/the-ruling-party-far-from-consensus-and-without-a-clear-political-message/
Disqus comments