Russian President Vladimir Putin and his American counterpart Joe Biden in Geneva last June. /
Delegations from both countries meet in Geneva to develop a new framework of “strategic stability” that guarantees peace
As a result of some of the agreements approved on June 16 in Geneva by the presidents of Russia and the United States, Vladimir Putin and Joe Biden, delegations from the two countries met this Wednesday with the intention of developing a new framework of “stability strategic ”that guarantees the world a more or less secure future and sets aside the danger of a nuclear apocalypse. The scene of the meeting has once again been Geneva and, according to the Americans, there have been “substantial” advances.
The US State Department, in the mouth of its spokesman, Ned Price, has declared, after the talks in Geneva on “strategic security”, that Washington “is committed to reducing the risks of armed conflict and nuclear war.” In his words, there was talk of “the possibility of a new type of control of atomic arsenals.” Price stressed that the tone of the discussion was “substantial and professional.”
In his opinion, the meeting held this Wednesday in Switzerland “marks the beginning of the dialogue with Russia.” The spokesman for US Diplomacy said that the US side laid out US security “priorities” and its vision of existing “threats.” Also, according to Price, the calendar of future rounds of meetings was discussed to deepen the matter, the first of which should take place in September.
However, the Russian delegation has been less optimistic and has not commented anything that the meetings will continue soon. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Riabkov had previously questioned Washington’s “seriousness” in its intention to address with “energy” the need to guarantee strategic security. Opposite Riabkov was the “number two” of the State Department, Wendy Sherman, as head of the US delegation.
And it is that this first attempt at rapprochement in Geneva has been preceded by statements by Biden once again accusing Moscow of interfering in its internal affairs and of already trying to influence the mid-term elections of 2022. According to the US president It is “a pure and simple violation of our sovereignty”, something that the Russian authorities deny.
Although the worst thing in the Kremlin is what Biden added later: “The Russian president has a real problem, he is at the head of an economy that has nuclear weapons and oil wells, nothing more. “In my opinion this makes it even more dangerous,” he added. The spokesman for the Russian Presidency, Dmitri Peskov, replied that “Joe Biden is wrong in his analysis (…) he has an inaccurate knowledge of contemporary Russia”. According to his account, ‘Russia is a nuclear power, but a very responsible nuclear power … and yes, we have a vast oil and gas sector. But to say that Russia has nothing else is fundamentally wrong. ‘
Russia is immersed in a process of general rearmament and modernization of its nuclear arsenals. It has stepped up testing of its new “invincible” hypersonic missiles. While it is true that, as soon as Biden arrived at the White House, Moscow and Washington decided to extend the New START Nuclear Weapons Reduction and Limitation Treaty, signed in 2010 by the presidents of both countries, for five more years.
Biden said in Geneva in June that “I think the last thing Putin wants now is a Cold War” and noted that the summit with him was “productive, positive, despite the discrepancies.” However, the US president wanted to make it clear that not only “strategic stability”, that is, the future of the New START agreement, but also cybersecurity measures will require “consultations” going forward. He insisted that “some crucial infrastructures” must be kept out of cyberattacks. But these continue to occur and Washington threatens to apply new sanctions to Moscow.
Sanctions are precisely the aspect that most poisons relations with Russia, as is the case with the European Union. French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently failed in their attempt to organize a summit with Putin due to the rejection of some of the member countries. At the bottom of the problem is Ukraine, where Kiev fails to reestablish control over its eastern provinces, torn apart thanks to the help of Moscow after the annexation of Crimea.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’,
‘https://ift.tt/2EUDMIP);
fbq(‘init’, ‘492946631038788’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
.
source https://pledgetimes.com/us-and-russia-approach-positions-to-avoid-a-nuclear-conflict/
Disqus comments